• About
  • Sponsors
  • RSS
  • Archive

liz-blog-220

Being Geek Chic is a blog about one woman navigating the male-dominated industries of production and tech. It's written by Elizabeth Giorgi, Founder, CEO and Director of Mighteor - one of the world's first internet video production companies. Learn more about Mighteor here.

twitter instagram linkedin vimeo

insta-banner

Awesome geeks join the mailing list:


  • Note

    25th May 2016

    The Gendered Nature of Entertainment Reviews: A Lesson in Socialized Sexism

    I’m tired of constantly pointing out sexism in the entertainment + media + production industry. At cocktail parties. In pitch meetings. In conversations with my team, my family, my friends and my mentors. It’s a seemingly endless well of awful that never runs dry. So much so, that a year ago, I straight up decided that I was only going to focus on the positive ways we can change the industry. 

    But today I’m going to have to step away from my previously valiant effort to talk about something that is so pervasive, and yet, so silent that it’s difficult to talk about. It’s about how we teach little boys and little girls to experience and process stories about the opposite gender. Specifically, it’s about how that phenomena negatively impacts how we view entertainment later in life and contributes to a silently socialized sexism that is almost impossible to call out. 

    Well, guess what: I’m calling it out.

    Or at least I’m going to attempt to. In March of this year, the new Ghostbusters trailer was released to mixed reviews - for all of a minute. And then, the reviews turned ugly. So much so, that the trailer is now the most disliked movie trailer of all time, according to YouTube. What does that look like in real numbers? 841,930 Dislikes. If genuine fans of the original franchise were so hard up on repping the OG, then I guess I could see why they would feel the need to put down the reboot in the form of an internet thumbs down. But we all know that this is not where that story is going.  

    Since the trailer’s release, the film, the actors and director Paul Feig have been the targets of unprecedented negativity unlike any reboot has ever seen. I am going to call it bullying, because frankly, that’s what it is. I’m not going to give it the time of day by sharing some of the comments here, but if you want to, just look at the comments on ANY news story about Ghostbusters. If you’re not depressed after five minutes, you have a special talent. CBS News laid it out pretty simply: 

    “So what makes this trailer so much more objectionable than others, like the critically panned “Batman v. Superman: Dawn of Justice” (16,495 dislikes) or last year’s “Fantastic Four” reboot (7,391 down-votes)?”

    Keep in mind, we know just how bad the movies above are already. The negative reaction to Ghostbusters is based entirely on a 2 minute trailer which reveals very little about the actual plot of the movie. Who has ever said: “I loved the trailer, but hated the movie!” No one. Ever. In the history of time. As a result, it’s hard not to immediately assume that the negative reaction to the trailer and the film is based entirely on the gender of the people in it. And if you want to disagree, you can feel free to go check out all the comments on the video itself on YouTube. Again, I refuse to give those kinds of comments space on this blog, but they basically amount to a violent hatred of women having a role in the Ghostbusters franchise and how utterly unfunny the women in the film will be. 

    If you think that the reaction to Ghostbusters is a solitary one that is isolated to this individual reboot, I invite you to look at a similar phenomena recently uncovered by the data blog, FiveThirtyEight.  It turns out that when men and women rate television shows on IMDB, women generally rate male-led programming the same way men do. But men? Well, men seem to apply a “lady-centric” de-merit to any television show that primarily features women. If Ghostbusters exists on the troll end of the spectrum, then the findings about television show ratings on IMDB may serve as a median. Specifically: 

    “Women gave their top 100 shows, on average, a 7.8 rating, about the same score they gave the top 100 male-dominated programs, 8.0. …Men gave their top 100 an average score of 8.2 but gave the top 100 female-skewed shows a mere 6.9 average ratings. Shows with more than 10,000 ratings are inherently popular and yet men thought the programs in that group that skew female were below average.”

    Does this apply to all men? No. #NOTALLMEN. Amen. But, when looking at data in aggregate of larger cultural phenomena around the preferences of male and female consumers, it’s important to note that outliers are not the story. And while the screaming trolls on YouTube might also be another kind of outlier, the nature of anonymous points-based reviewing that doesn’t require prosaic use of the comments section to share sexist slurs, reveals how the male community at large generally views programming that primarily casts the opposite sex. It doesn’t mean they are misogynist. It doesn’t mean they are sexist. It doesn’t mean they are bad people. What it means is that at some point, they are taught that shows about women are somehow not capable of being analyzed and reviewed in the same objective way. And that somehow, the factor that determines “how good” a show is, is in part, determined by the sex of the stars. 

    What FiveThirtyEight’s analysis doesn’t reveal is whether or not these men and women actually watched the shows in question. However, I think there’s one subset of data that they didn’t really dive deeply into that really highlights just how actively a certain subset of male internet users will go to ensure that the qualitative rating of entertainment featuring women is exceptionally lower than that of their male-starring programming. Looking at shows with more than 10,000 user reviews on IMDB, there are only 2 shows that women rated a full point lower than men. One of them is Beavis and Butt-Head. The other is Star Wars: Clone Wars. However, the list of shows that men rated a full single point lower than women rated them? 50. FIFTY FREAKING SHOWS.

    Amongst these shows is Sabrina the Teenage Witch, which I have to point out featured a younger Paul Feig as science teacher Mr. Pool. But you probably won’t be surprised to find nearly every single Shonda Rhimes show on the list, either. 

    If you’ve stuck with me this long, congratulations. I’m finally going to make my larger point. Thank you. Thank you for being patient.

    This behavior, this seemingly latent “female deduction” that happens to our entertainment does not happen in a vacuum. For years, our media has been asking the obnoxious question of: Can women be funny? I contend that what we are actually dealing with on a cultural level is much more negative. The real question is: Are women ALLOWED to be funny in our entertainment? And that doesn’t just happen. That is socialized in us from a very young age. 

    So, where does this come from? Bold statement time: Children’s freaking books. 

    A few years ago, J.K. Rowling made news when she revealed that her publisher had asked to her change her name to the more male sounding “J.K” for the Harry Potter series for fear that little boys wouldn’t pick up a book written by a woman. And while that story is a perfect illustration of just how subliminal this kind of subtle sexism has been in publishing, I contend that little boys are taught from a very early age that stories about women are rare and not for them. This is not necessarily explicitly said. Rather, this is implicitly indicated by the sheer volume and exposure to the kinds of stories that are told. Little girls? Well, there are no options. So nearly every story is for them. And the data backs this up. Unsurprisingly, this goes ALL the way back to your picture books. 

    As the Wall Street Journal reports: 

    “A 2011 Florida State University study found that just 7.5 percent of nearly 6,000 picture books published between 1900 and 2000 depict female animal protagonists. … No more than 33 percent of children’s books in any given year featured an adult woman or female animal, but adult men and male animals appeared in 100 percent of the books.”

    When only 7% of children’s picture books feature female characters, female characters become abnormal. If something is abnormal, it isn’t widely accepted. And if that precedent begins before you can even read or write, you are bound to start to have some unconscious bias. In fact, research finds that this bias sets in by the time boys are in the fourth grade: 

    “Two studies, one from 1978 and one from 1988, did find that boys expressed a preference for male characters, but the youngest age group studied was the fourth grade, at which point it is impossible to separate nature from nurture.” 

    Let me reiterate that this is not all men. I know plenty of men who love shows and movies starring women. But this is a ground up problem. This starts from before the moment a child is born when books are wrapped and packaged and delivered to waiting parents eager to raise smart and well-balanced kids. 

    How can we possibly expect Hollywood to change if we teach little boys from the time they learn their very first words that female characters are not the norm? How can we expect a Ghostbusters reboot to receive the same warm reception as a Jurassic Park remake in a culture that celebrates male heroism and applies sex-based penalties to media starring women? And how can we expect female storytellers to receive opportunities from the powers that be when the socialized belief amongst 50% of the population is that women’s stories are unpopular before they’ve even seen it? 

    We can’t. 

    We must be better. And it starts with little boys. 

    Ghostbusters Paul Feig Sexism Women in Media Women in Entertainment Feminism
  • Note

    2nd September 2011

    In Review: Books of My Summer

    In June, I wrote this post about the books I hoped to read this summer. Well, I managed to read three of the four (I got on a little bit of a Neil Gaiman side-track some point in August) and wanted to give you my honest opinion of my choices.

    The whole idea behind my summer reading list was that I was going to read books that I’ve missed in previous years or just overlooked. So here’s how it went:

    Paul Feig’s Kick Me: Adventures in Adolescents

    Simply put: very funny, completely self-deprecating. 

    The good: The book is truly an honest evaluation of what it’s like to be a nerd in middle school. Everything from eating to walking to dressing can be a challenge. Feig hilariously navigates these realities with a self-deprecating wit that helped the book chug right along. In fact, I liked this book so much that I even picked up his second book, Superstud: Or How I Became a 24-Year-Old Virgin as a follow up.

    The bad: There’s no real sense of what it all means. If you were a middle-school nerd who was looking for some insights on how to survive this stage in your life, I wouldn’t point you to this book. It would be like rubbing salt on the wound.

    Overall: I loved it. Go read it.

    Nick Hornby’s High Fidelity

    The only book I didn’t get to. Boo!  

    Official Book Club Selection: A Memoir According to Kathy Griffin

    Simply put: more insightful and sad than expected

    The good: Kathy is hilarious, no one is going to question that. The big surprise here is how open she is about every aspect of her life. From her strained relationship with her brother to her failed marriage, she lets it all out there. Despite the surprising seriousness, she manages to take you through her life events while entertaining and giving some pointers about fame along the way. 

    The bad: At times, you feel like maybe this is TOO MUCH information. She gets lost in irrelevant details about locations and times and dollar amounts.

    Overall: I loved it. Go read it.

     

    Laurie Notaro’s It Looked Different on the Model: Epic Tales of Impending Shame and Infamy

    Simply put: childish and over-the-top

    The good: It has funny, LOL moments. The short, essay style of Notaro’s books make them a quick, easy read. Great for the beach.

    The bad: For some reason, I’m over her books. It’s sad! But the reality is that her books have started to feel like an immature person trying to justify their alcoholism and general bad behavior.

    Overall: EH. If you liked it before, you’ll like it again. If you know her schtick and don’t need anymore of it - skip it.

    Now, I just have to come up with a fall book list… hmm, how am I ever going to choose?

    book reading In review Paul Feig Kathy Griffin
  • Link

    27th June 2011

    Bridesmaids will be Apatow's biggest hit yet

    Bridesmaids, which was directed by Paul Feig and produced by Judd Apatow, added over $5 million to its $146.6 million domestic haul this weekend and is now poised to surpass his biggest-ever hit, Knocked Up (at $148.6 million), in the next few days.

    Do you hear that Hollywood?

    Bridesmaids Paul Feig movies Hollywood kristen wiig
  • Note

    20th June 2011

    Books of my summer

    This summer, I decided to fill my “to read” list with books that I’ve missed in previous years or just overlooked. I have to admit that this list gets me very excited to read.

    Paul Feig’s Kick Me: Adventures in Adolescents

    If you loved this summer’s Bridesmaids or you have ever caught an episode of Freaks and Geeks, then this book should be on your list. In fact, you should be ashamed that you haven’t read it already - I know I was.

    Paul Feig is the creator of Freaks and Geeks and makes plenty of guest appearances in tv and movies. He’s in Knocked Up, Nurse Jackie, The Drew Carey Show and was Mr. Eugene Pool in Sabrina the Teenage Witch. Feig is a regular renaissance man.

    My initial impressions of the book? The first chapter had me gasping for breath so it’s a quick read and a lot of fun. It’s almost unbelievable how unfortunate young Feig is, but you know it’s all coming from a good place in his heart.

    Nick Hornby’s High Fidelity

    If you’ve seen the movie, you know that this a romantic comedy from the point of view of the man. I have a theory that if a movie is adapted to film and the it is somehow a great movie, then the book is sure to be a crowd pleaser. I can’t wait to find out.

    Official Book Club Selection: A Memoir According to Kathy Griffin

    I’ve always enjoyed Kathy Griffin’s stand up comedy and his Bravo reality show, but her book initially escaped my book bag. Why? The reviews from some of my favorite literary writers were mixed at best. However, there’s not better vote of confidence than my other favorite Amazon reviewers giving something a 5-star review. Therefore, it makes my summer 2011 list.

    Laurie Notaro’s It Looked Different on the Model: Epic Tales of Impending Shame and Infamy

    The only new book that has made my list is Notaro’s upcoming paperback. If you don’t know anything about this woman, all you need to know is that she’s hilarious and she can prove it. Take this excerpt from The Idiot Girls’ Action-Adventure Club:

    I want a man as nice as my retarded dog, but one that doesn’t crap on the floor.

    What made your 2011 Summer Reading List?

    books reading Paul Feig Kathy Griffin
The End